Obama's Infrastructure And Business Investment Plan Would Take A While To Show Much Effect
Yesterday, President Obama announced a six-year $50 billion program to rebuild 150,000 miles of highways, to lay and maintain 4,000 miles of rail lines, to restore 150 miles of runways, and to put the NextGen air traffic control system in place. Tomorrow in Cleveland, he is expected to announce full expensing for all businesses of qualified investment made by the end of 2011. These a reasonable next steps to sustain the economy as the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act spending tails off, but most of the impact would be felt after 2012, and it's doubtful that the Senate would pass these proposals this year in any event.
Last January, Congressional Budget Office Director Doug Elmendorf presented some very useful testimony on the impact of various stimulus proposals on GDP and employment. Table 1 on page 11 shows CBO's estimates that infrastructure investment begun in April, 2010 would raise GDP between 0.5% and 1.2% over five years, CY2010-CY2015, and would take two years to raise employment by between 2 and 4 years of full-time equivalent employment per $1 million spent, or between 100,000 and 200,000 FTEs over six years from the $50 billion proposed. CBO estimated expensing would raise GDP by 0.2% to 1.0% over five years and would raise employment by between 1 and 8 FTEs per $1 million of budgetary cost cumulatively over the same period. That's not a whole of lot employment compared to the 14.9 million currently unemployed.
Then there's the issue of paying for these proposals or adding their cost to the national debt, which is skyrocketing past 62% of GDP at the moment. See Table 1-6 on page 23 of CBO's August Update. Mr. Obama is expected to dust off some of his proposals to raise taxes on U.S. multinationals to pay for the expensing provision.
Meanwhile, Congress will return next Tuesday with little prospect of passing President Obama's proposals before the election or even this year. The Republican appear poised to take the House and to come close to taking the Senate on November 2, which seems likely to freeze policymaking on Capitol Hill until early next year.
Bookmark/Search this post with
About the estimates of 'lag'
About the estimates of 'lag' time re: infrastructure. Why don't we try and see which starts creating jobs first: infrastructure RFPs issued now versus the private market (you know the one that just destroyed 8 million jobs).
My bet is it will be infrastructure first. In fact, my bet is that the private market will, in fact, be stimulated by infrastructure created investment. That will be the order of recovery.
Dropping tax rates as a means of stimulation will only stimulate consumer demand at this point, at best, and much of what comprises consumer demand is manufactured offshore. If we're going to continue supporting offshore manufacturing anyway, we might as well shave off a little money for badly needed infrastructure.
UMass academic studies indicate 18,000 jobs per billion of infrastructure. Obama should have proposed $300 billion per year for each of the next five years.
That's 5.4 million per $300 billion. Some of it will be labor (those 18,000 jobs per)but the majority of it will go to domestically produced goods and material.
With $2.2 trillion in projects already identified, we'll end up with a much better infrastructure supporting everything--including corporations.