CapitalGainsandGames Washington, Wall Street and Everything in Between



Bailout in Lieu of Bankruptcy: The Sad Saga of AIG

17 Nov 2009
Posted by Andrew Samwick

Andrew Samwick's picture

The Office of the Inspector General of the TARP released a tough report yesterday illuminating and criticizing the way the flawed design of the AIG bailout led to large transfers from taxpayers to AIG's counterparties.  You can read a good article by Mary Williams Walsh at The New York Times and another report from The Washington Post

I would take issue with one statement in the report and the associated discussion.  From the NYT article:

The Fed “refused to use its considerable leverage,” Neil M. Barofsky, the special inspector general for the Troubled Asset Relief Program, wrote in a report to be officially released on Tuesday, examining the much-criticized decision to make A.I.G.’s trading partners whole when people and businesses were taking painful losses in the financial markets.

The Fed should not have been using its leverage as the lender of last resort or as a regulator to drive a hard bargain with private financial institutions.  That, to me, is too much of a conflict of interest -- your regulator should not be compromising your financial position for the sake of some other institution.  That is government overreach in my book, and it only comes in because the government has already overstepped what it should be doing in offering bailout in lieu of bankruptcy.

If the Fed and Treasury were going to use some threat, it should have been that they that they would do nothing -- that they would allow AIG to go bankrupt -- to drive a hard bargain.  The Fed and Treasury should never have removed that option.  They could always have functioned as a lender of last resort to AIG's creditors when AIG entered bankruptcy.  Sure, it would be a messier set of transactions, but protecting the taxpayers' funds would have been worth it.

The idea that the Fed's leadership thought that the best course of action was to ask for voluntary concessions or draw on enormous sums of taxpayer money, rather than subjecting AIG and its creditors to a bankruptcy proceeding, is truly unbelievable.

I thought the Fed OMC was all bankers?

How is this in any way surprising? They're all bankers, and they see the difficulties of life from the point of view of a banker. When they're done with the Fed, they'll need a nice $10m per year job at one of these banks...you can't be too mean to your future employers.





Read Us Your Way

Track all the latest updates via RSS, Twitter or Facebook. Or get a daily digest of posts delivered straight to your inbox -- just sign up using the form below.

E-mail Address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


Advertising


Copyright

Creative Commons LicenseThe content of CapitalGainsandGames.com is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. Need permissions beyond the scope of this license? Please submit a request here.